A well-executed CRM project can be a game-changer for universities — streamlining communications, easing admin pressures, and helping to turn more prospects into enrolled students. But when things go wrong, the fallout can be frustrating, expensive, and time-consuming.
So, what separates a successful CRM project from one that never quite delivers?
Let’s break it down.
Customer relationship management systems (CRMs) have been transforming student recruitment for years. When managed well, they simplify admissions, improve the applicant experience, and give staff the tools they need to focus on what really matters — building relationships.
But not all projects go to plan.
In fact, a third of CRM projects fail, according to CIO Magazine. That’s a lot of time, energy and budget down the drain.
Why does this happen? One key reason, according to Scott Edinger’s article in the Harvard Business Review, is that many organisations treat CRM as a tool for inspection, not for improvement. While this research focuses on corporate sales teams, it maps surprisingly well onto higher education.
Let’s take a look at how you can avoid the pitfalls — and set your CRM project up for success from the very start.
The development and maintenance of an in-house system is a complex and time-consuming task. Full Fabric lets you turn your full attention to maximizing growth and performance.
It’s easy to get caught up in features, dashboards and reporting metrics. But the primary goal of any higher education CRM project should be simple — increase enrolments by engaging the right prospects, at the right time, in the right way.
Yes, reporting is important. But if the focus shifts too far towards data collection and internal metrics, the real power of the CRM — nurturing prospective students — gets lost.
Senior leadership needs to champion this goal from day one. If the whole institution understands that the CRM’s success is measured in enrolments, not activity logs, the project will have a far stronger foundation.
Let’s be honest — in many universities, marketing and admissions operate in parallel, not in partnership. A CRM project is your chance to fix that.
These two teams have overlapping goals and should be working from the same playbook. That means:
Your CRM can be the bridge — but only if you build that bridge intentionally, with collaboration at its core.
Edinger warns against using CRMs purely for surveillance. It’s a valid point. If staff feel the platform is just there to track performance or scrutinise activity, they’ll be reluctant to embrace it.
Instead, treat your CRM as a support system. Use it to:
The more value your teams see in the CRM, the more likely they are to use it effectively.
Of course, even the best intentions can’t rescue a project if the tech isn’t up to the job.
That’s why an all-in-one solution built for higher education — like Full Fabric — can make all the difference. With Origin, you get:
As Emma Spittles from the Said Foundation puts it, “Full Fabric helped us digitise the whole admissions process, which not only improved the applicant experience but also made the review and selection process much easier.”
It’s not just about the software — it’s about the people, the planning, and the process behind it.
A successful CRM project doesn’t just improve operations — it transforms the way your university connects with prospective students.
Get the right teams on board. Focus on enrolment outcomes. Prioritise collaboration over control. And choose a platform that’s built for your world.
Curious about how Full Fabric can help? Request a demo today and see how we support higher education institutions in leading CRM projects that actually work.